Because logs are cool.

[bliumchik]

tryx_:So what exactly have you managed to solve by duck?
maggiebloome:Jenny.
tryx_:because thats a pretty big claim
maggiebloome:And Diana.
maggiebloome:And several random bus stop discussiona
tryx_:Ah, do you mean "duck" or A duck
tryx_:like quacks and stuff
maggiebloome:...
maggiebloome:...thou knowest not the secrets for the enlightened.
tryx_:But but...! Sharing is caring
maggiebloome:So is duck.
maggiebloome:...see, I solved a problem with duck!
tryx_:damn your duck
tryx_:or just duck in genereal
tryx_:I'm not sure
maggiebloome:muahahaha
maggiebloome:I am reading bash in between blatantly plagiarising my enlgish essay
maggiebloome:this problem is the exception, in that it cannot be solved by duck.
tryx_:yay! bash
tryx_:Ha!
maggiebloome:unless the duck is on IRC
tryx_:So your statement is wrong
tryx_:What if you hand in a duck?
maggiebloome:But I have previously made the statement "Everything has an exception"
maggiebloome:so it is not, in fact, wrong
maggiebloome:it simply has an exception
maggiebloome:I could hand in a duck
maggiebloome:I'm sure you don't have to write essays about the american dream in the psych ward
tryx_:Does the statement: ""Everything has an exception" have an exception?
maggiebloome:yes
tryx_:Well, what?
tryx_:and then your statement is wrong
maggiebloome:not really
maggiebloome:it just has an exception
maggiebloome:sinbce we've accepted that "everything can be solved by duck" having an exception does not make it wrong
maggiebloome:the same can apply to the statement "everything has an exception"
maggiebloome:otherwise there would be no need for that statement
maggiebloome:because things would not have exceptions
maggiebloome:they would simply be wrong
tryx_:But the thing that makes ""Everything has an exception" have an exception does not have an exception and therefore makes the statement false.
maggiebloome:Why does ir nor have an exception?
tryx_:In order for ""Everything has an exception" to have an exception there must be something with no exception, right?
maggiebloome:Yes.
tryx_:But that contradicts the statement ""Everything has an exception"
tryx_:because that statement would be something with no exception.
tryx_:Because that is how it is defined
maggiebloome:But that statement is the exception to the statement "everything has an exception"
tryx_:So? It still also contradicts it
maggiebloome:So, since having an exception does not make something wrong, the statement remains true
maggiebloome:Because, as I have already said, if having an exception made something wrong, there would be no need for exceptions
maggiebloome:because things would not have exceptions
maggiebloome:they would simply be wrong
tryx_:Hmmm...
Maggie's logic skills take a bow
tryx_:lol, well done