(no subject)

[bliumchik]

There doesn't need to be a conflict between science and religion. Religion is something people believe in and science is something people use. Notice whenever they clash it's because someone is trying to believe in science or, more often, use religion - and then there's Intelligent Design, which is the worst of both worlds.

This was your two am installment of "people are dumb. why." theatre.

Comments

[lackofmendacity.livejournal.com]

*is amused*

But seriously, I've never thought about it like that before. (Speaking of which, any nice presents this year? *g* And I hope the candle lighting went successfully. :D)

[bethrealistic.livejournal.com]

Haha that's very insightful for 1:42am.

... actually, that's very insightful for any time of the day!

[cynicky.livejournal.com]

Um, you do realise that that third sentence doesn't actually make any real sense?

[maggiebloome.livejournal.com]

Define real sense at two in the morning :P I'm a poet, I'm allowed!

[cynicky.livejournal.com]

Let's see that stand up the court of law: "I'm allowed to use poetry as legal tender, I'm a poet!"

[maggiebloome.livejournal.com]

The difference being that legal tender is not made of words, and the sentence you objected to is.

[cynicky.livejournal.com]

No, but traditional poetry is written on paper, I was referring to them in that way

[maggiebloome.livejournal.com]

The significant variable here is the words, not the material.

[cynicky.livejournal.com]

Alright, let me put it a different way, poetic license does not stand up in a real argument

[maggiebloome.livejournal.com]

I know, I was just pulling your leg :P

[cynicky.livejournal.com]

I need real interaction with people dammit!

[woodburner.livejournal.com]

That was a pretty good way to put it, gotta hand it to ya.